Bob Ippolito wrote:

> Currently, ActivePython on Mac OS X is almost exactly the same thing 
> that we're going to be shipping with the universal build of 2.4.2.  The 
> differences will be:
> 
> 1. They aren't shipping readline, we will

This matters quite a bit, I think.

> 2. We'll probably ship universal first

Always good to be on the bleeding edge!

> 3. I don't believe they have the PATH hack in their installer

That matters too: we've spent enough time nattering on about that to 
prove it!

> 4. They ship with an ActivePython icon for pythonw, we'll stick with the 
> current icon.

I don't give a *&&^^& what the icon is.

I don't know why, but somehow I feel better about depending on Bob I., 
than I do about depending on ActiveState. As long as Bob os willing to 
build what we've been discussing, I say we go with that.

There does need to be a mention of other Python installers somewhere 
anyway, and ActiveState should certainly be listed.

-Chris


-- 
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
                                                
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT         (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig

Reply via email to