On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com> wrote: > > On 31 May, 2010, at 23:25, Johan Gyllenspetz wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> What is the status on py2app -> snow leopard -> x86_64 and ports. > > What ports? >
Sorry I ment macports. >> Do I >> really need to build all port packages with the flag +universal, it >> seems like it seems the application when inspected returns. >> >> file dist/dog.app/Contents/MacOS/dog >> dist/dog.app/Contents/MacOS/dog: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures >> dist/dog.app/Contents/MacOS/dog (for architecture i386): Mach-O >> executable i386 >> dist/dog.app/Contents/MacOS/dog (for architecture ppc): Mach-O >> executable ppc >> >> Is there a way to tell py2app to build the app for x86_64 instead thus >> solving the issue with having to build all port packages with the >> universal flag (which can be quite tricky). > > Rebuilding the stub executable in the py2app package should be enough to > enable building 64-bit binaries. Adding proper support for this is on my > list, but I don't know when I'll get around to it. > Nice! Any tips of how I rebuild the binary manually? > Ronald > > Johan > _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/Pythonmac-SIG