On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com> wrote: > > Option to use the built-in modulefinder instead of modulegraph: I was > getting tired of having to write workaround imports to modulegraph > (which doesn't like relative imports very well, even the latest > version) and I didn't want to dig in modulegraph itself, so as an > experiment, I added a "--use-modulefinder" option to py2app. I haven't > tested it much, but so far, I'm able to build one of my apps *without* > the workarounds I had for modulegraph, so it my case, it works better. > > > This won't get merged, I'd much rather fix modulegraph. If that doesn't work > out for some reason modulegraph should get ripped out, choosing between the > two is unnecessary complexity for both the maintainers and users of py2app. > One of the things on my todolist for py2app and related modules is to add > proper tests, which should make it easier to ensure that bugs get fixed and > stay fixed. > And then there are the mac-related bugs in CPython itself, which also need > my attention. > Ronald >
Sure. I didn't implement this in the hope that it was merged, it was more of a way to experiment how modulegraph and modulefinder compared when I ran it on my apps. Virgil _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/Pythonmac-SIG