So what do you suggest? If a CS is old enough, rebase is the least of the problems.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 3:00 PM, John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:16 PM, John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Amir Ladsgroup <ladsgr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hey, > >> There are about 200 open patches in pywikibot right now, huge part of > them > >> are obsolete, really problematic, or redundant patches. > > > > Can you identify some that fit into these categories? Maybe add a > > note on them recommending what should be done? > > Careful what I ask for I guess. > > Amir, please do not spam people unnecessarily. > > you say 'needs rebase' to this patch, which has two -1's on it. > > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/141392/ > > It needs more than a rebase, so please dont do that. > Many of the other comments you are adding are equally useless. > > -- > John Vandenberg > > _______________________________________________ > Pywikipedia-l mailing list > Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l > -- Amir
_______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
