On 2015-03-12 02:50, Josef Skladanka wrote:
Adam,
please set these up for review in Phabricator. I strongly suspect
(given the time that I spent looking at the changes so far) that some
discussion will be required, and Phab is _the_ place to do it.
Also, please make sure to rebase your repos to their current state,
before creating the phab reviews.
For further development, I'd suggest creating an account on Bitbucket,
and using the "core" repos - all the FedoraQA Devs can write to the
repos, and all the "admins" and administer it. Once you have the
accound, I'll add you to the Dev group, and having a "feature" branch
in the core repo seems quite better, given the development work-flows
we currently adhere to.
Sure, will do. IIRC, when I sent my last round, you didn't have the
openQA stuff set up for review in Phab so you asked for email, so I just
figured to carry on that way.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
