On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 00:13 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, > > could somebody please test upgrade from fully upgraded Workstation 28 to > 29? I have a suspicion that it will be blocked by [0], yet I lack disk > space to try it. > > Thanks. > > [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605613
openQA does this on every compose. Upgrading with dnf without '--allowerasing' does indeed fail on this problem, but with '--allowerasing' it works (the openQA test first tries the former, if it fails, it registers a 'soft fail' and tries the latter instead). GNOME Software, IIRC, does the equivalent of '--best --allowerasing' by default, so upgrading graphically would probably work. https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/261810 (Note today's test failed due to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610562 ). Also note this should probably have gone to test@ or devel@... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/O5QP2FBWPDXOKQCFTZRCUZZIYOQ3RCMN/
