On 1.8.2018 00:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 00:13 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi,
could somebody please test upgrade from fully upgraded Workstation 28 to
29? I have a suspicion that it will be blocked by [0], yet I lack disk
space to try it.
Thanks.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605613
openQA does this on every compose.
Upgrading with dnf without '--allowerasing' does indeed fail on this
problem, but with '--allowerasing' it works (the openQA test first
tries the former, if it fails, it registers a 'soft fail' and tries the
latter instead). GNOME Software, IIRC, does the equivalent of '--best
--allowerasing' by default, so upgrading graphically would probably
work.
Thanks!
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/261810
(Note today's test failed due to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610562 ).
Also note this should probably have gone to test@ or devel@...
Probably yes, my fault.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WPDVZKQPVANIVSWLVNYP4UPLNVLBJ5YA/
