Dear Mr. Weir
Please assign me reports to confirm.
I use Debian x64 and prefer Writer and Calc.
Thank you.

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013, at 18:26, Rob Weir wrote:
> Welcome again to all QA volunteers, New and Old!
> 
> If you received this note, that means you are subscribed to the
> mailing list.  That is good.  It also means that you've received a lot
> of posts from me in recent days.  Sorry about that.  I do try to greet
> each new volunteer personally, and since most new volunteers have
> similar questions this leads to a lot of repetitive posts.
> 
> As we all get up to speed to the QA tasks, we'll spend more time
> discussing the actually QA work.  And at some point others will feel
> comfortable welcoming our new volunteers as well.  Remember, there is
> nothing special about me.  If you know the answer to a question, or
> can point a new volunteer to the Orientation Modules, then please do.
> Recruiting and training new volunteers is ongoing activity for any
> thriving open source project.  Indeed, the same is true for any
> thriving corporation as well.
> 
> So where do we stand with the QA for OpenOffice?
> 
> 1) There is a "respin" of AOO 3.4.1 in the works, planned for later
> this month.  It does not have any code changes, but does have a set of
> additional new translations:  Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Korean,
> Polish, Basque, Asturian and Scottish Gaelic.
> 
> Since the code is unchanged, it is not requiring any functional
> testing by the QA team.  But the localization team is reviewing the
> binaries to verify that the menus, dialogs, language tools (spell
> checking), etc., are working properly.  If you are fluent in any of
> these 8 languages and want to help with this final review, please send
> a note to the localization mailing list at:
> l...@openoffice.apache.org.
> 
> 2) AOO 4.0 -- We're still waiting for a developer snapshot release
> that has the UI features added.  When that comes out we can test it.
> But not yet.
> 
> 3) Backlog of unconfirmed defect reports.   We have 2984 unconfirmed
> defects, some dating back several years.  This is an improvement over
> last week when we had 3016.  But it is still a cause for concern that
> we have so many.  Why?  Although the severe bugs, the blocking,
> show-stopper bugs will always get attention, since they are so
> prominent, the more common place bugs, the ones that effect the user's
> daily experience and their perception of "quality", can get lost in
> the noise if we're not keeping up with new user bug reports, reviewing
> them and confirming them in a timely fashion.
> 
> Now obviously this backlog was not created overnight.  It is years in
> the making.  And we won't eliminate it over night.  But I'd love to
> make slow & steady progress to get this number down and keep it down.
>  Twenty volunteers doing ten defect reports a week can eliminate this
> backlog before AOO 4.0 ships and we get flooded with new bug reports.
> 
> That is why I am encouraging new volunteers to help with confirming
> defect reports.  I'm doing the same myself.   If you have not already
> been assigned a batch to work with, and want to help, let me know what
> platform(s) you can test on, and any special requests (I like Calc,
> anything but Base, etc.) and I'll get you started.  Or feel free to
> run the following query in Bugzilla and assign yourself bugs that look
> interesting:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=unconfirmed-defects&list_id=41761
> 
> (A bug that is currently assigned to "iss...@openoffice.apache.org" or
> assigned to an address ending in openoffice.org is currently
> unassigned)
> 
> Thanks everyone for your hard work!
> 
> -Rob

Reply via email to