On 6/6/13 2:13 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote: > I can understand voting for a new logo. > > But voting for bugs? > > A bug is a bug and needs to be fixed.
you are correct but I believe it is intended to get a priority list. We have long list of bugs and that can't be fixed all. We always get new bugs and have to decide o demand if they are critical or not to move a release. But in general bugs should be fixed all or should be marked as invalid or whatever applies. Juergen > > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 14:54, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > > Hi All, > > Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to > be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release > blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field is beside the > importance field, in a bug form). We hope to get the vote score this > week, any bugs you think most critical to you, please bring out and > let's discuss. > > [1] > [1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=ru > n&namedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%3F&sharer_id=249289&list_id=64740 > [2] Also attach the file for the list > (AOO4.0.0_release_blocker_candidates.ods) > > Regards, > Yu Zhen > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [2]qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: [3]qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > Email had 1 attachment: > * AOO4.0.0_release_blocker_candidates.ods > * 26k (application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet) > > References > > 1. > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%3F&sharer_id=249289&list_id=64740 > 2. mailto:qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > 3. mailto:qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org