On 6/6/13 2:13 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
> I can understand voting for a new logo.
> 
> But voting for bugs?
> 
> A bug is a bug and needs to be fixed.

you are correct but I believe it is intended to get a priority list. We
have long list of bugs and that can't be fixed all. We always get new
bugs and have to decide o demand if they are critical or not to move a
release.

But in general bugs should be fixed all or should be marked as invalid
or whatever applies.

Juergen


> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 14:54, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to
> be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release
> blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field is beside the
> importance field, in a bug form). We hope to get the vote score this
> week, any bugs you think most critical to you, please bring out and
> let's discuss.
> 
> [1]
> [1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=ru
> n&namedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%3F&sharer_id=249289&list_id=64740
> [2] Also attach the file for the list
> (AOO4.0.0_release_blocker_candidates.ods)
> 
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [2]qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: [3]qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
>   Email had 1 attachment:
>   * AOO4.0.0_release_blocker_candidates.ods
>   *   26k (application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet)
> 
> References
> 
> 1. 
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%3F&sharer_id=249289&list_id=64740
> 2. mailto:qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> 3. mailto:qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to