The oldest version where the bug occurs is more meaningful than the version the bug reporter used. The bug history shows the bug reporters version. More fields - more confusion. IMHO current Bugzilla is good.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014, at 12:33, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi all > > I suggest that bugzilla should be improved to include two fields. > The first is filled by the reporter (can be someone very unexperienced) and > refers to the Version where the bug was observed. > A second field (which is not even visible in the first filling form) named > VersionFirst is automatically filled with the same version as Version and > can be refined by QA. > > Just my 2 cents. > Pedro > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Tal Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > [CCing QA, after just published to DEV] > > > > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote (Mar 10): > > > > > Changing entry of Field Version from an older version to a newer one > > > should not happen. > > > When a user submits a new issue the Field Version should contain the > > > version on which the user observes the issue. Experienced community > > > members, primarily by QA people, should refine the value, but only in the > > > direction to older versions. Thus, finally the Field Version should > > > document the version in which the issue occurs first. > > > > > > I just saw this comment by Oliver, and as a reporter/user/translator, this > > is new to me. > > I'll update the guide with this instruction ( > > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/HowToFileIssue), and I hope Oliver > > won't mind me quoting him. > > > > Please review the guide, and add/edit, or add a note in the Discussion of > > the Wiki page. > > Thanks. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
