> -----Original Message----- > From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 16:53 > To: qa@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field > > > It's not about to draw the line between issues that are resolved and > > verified solutions. It's about to differentiate issues that are in the > real > > application and therefore need to be fixed in the source code. Here we > use > > (or better should use) RESOLVED - FIXED. > > > > But what about issues that are also reporting a problem but the > solution > > (if there is any) is somewhere else? RESOLVED - FIXED doesn't fit, > RESOLVED > > - NOT_AN_ISSUE also not. > > > > Why not use the same nomenclature as the "sibling project"? RESOLVED - > NOTOURBUG [orcmid]
It seems to me that RESOLVED - RESOLVED is too mysterious and RESOLVED - NOTOURBUG is not much better than NOTANISSUE. RESOLVED - HANDLED might be closer, with the comment that achieves this explains how it is handled. (I.e., documentation, workaround, whatever.) I'm not in love with that term and don't know how it works for non-native English-language participants. > > I believe Apache QA needs a flowchart such as > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/c/c4/Unconfirmed_Bugs_Status_ Flowchart_Version_0.1.pdf > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/c/cb/Unconfirmed_Bugs_Status_Flowchart.odg [orcmid] That's a useful companion topic. (The PDF is apparently defective - Acrobat Reader doesn't see anything in it on Windows.) The .odg works though. I don't like that flowchart much. I don't think it covers the range that is needed for us. Perhaps it is incomplete and just deals with the front-end of issue triage? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
