I wonder how hard is to implement pure c++ "declarative" library. Afaik, 
qtdeclarative originally used v8 JavaScript engine which got replaced with 
Qt-ish engine to avoid conversions to/from Qt types. Maybe, it's possible to go 
the opposite direction and remove Qt dependency in the first place?
Except for GUI and script module, I don't think there's a lot of Qt stuff. 

Иван Комиссаров

> 14 мая 2019 г., в 12:33, Richard Weickelt <rich...@weickelt.de> написал(а):
> 
> 
>>> However, will this help to get new developers? Right now, there are not that
>>> many contributors.
>> 
>> I agree, how much money do you want to raise? And what for?
>> For now Qbs can use Qt (company/project) infra, so there's no need to
>> manage an infra.
> 
> The Qt Company pays for qt.io. We can ask them to sponsor the domain also in 
> the future, but we cannot expect it.
> 
> If we had fee-lancing contributors, then it might make sense to set up a 
> bounty system. I also find models like this https://www.patreon.com/bjorn 
> interesting. I guess that spare-time contributors have a different motivation 
> though.
> 
> What is IMO more important is, to turn qbs.io into an attractive landing 
> page. It should become more clear, that Qbs is no longer a The Qt Company 
> project. Might be worth to pay a web designer to come up with a professional 
> looking.  Any volunteers? https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QBS-1341
> 
> Richard
_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
Qbs@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs

Reply via email to