On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:38:25AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > [...] > jake had started that "qt-free qbs" project (he got as far as > eliminating (most) use of qt containers), but it was snuffed out because > it was unrealistic and counterproductive at that time. even now, no > patches in that direction will be accepted
Won't they? > unless a coherent final > picture and a credible committment to further maintenance is presented. Getting rid of implicitly shared containers should be a rather obvious move when "performance" is part of any "final picture", coherent or not. Andre' _______________________________________________ Qbs mailing list Qbs@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs