Hello!. In the second variant - do you need Group { fileTagsFilter: "application" fileTags: "trigrams-generator" }
? The product has that type already I’d say both variants are OK and there’s no preference. > 1 марта 2021 г., в 21:43, Карелин Павел <hka...@yandex.ru> написал(а): > > Colleagues, hello. > > It's a bit of a pity that I didn't get an answer to the last question, but > it's okay. There is a working option, and it can be used. > Christian, Alberto, thanks for helping to solve my problem. > > -- > BR, Pavel > > > 22.02.2021 19:07, Карелин Павел пишет: >> Christian, I experimented a little, and got another variant. >> >> Your variant (clarification: the generation of trigrams in binary form is >> performed by the parsetrigrams utility) : >> >> Product { >> name: "ParseTrigrams" >> targetName: "parsetrigrams" >> >> type: ["application"] >> ... >> files: [ >> "parsetrigrams.cpp" >> ] >> >> Group { >> fileTagsFilter: "application" >> fileTags: "trigrams-generator" >> } >> } >> >> Product { >> name: "QGit" >> targetName: "qgit" >> >> type: "application" >> >> Depends { name: "cpp" } >> Depends { name: "ParseTrigrams" } >> Depends { productTypes: ["trigrams-generator"] } >> Depends { name: "Qt"; submodules: ["core", "widgets"] } >> >> Group { >> fileTags: "trigrams" >> files: FileInfo.joinPaths(product.sourceDirectory, >> "spellcheck/sonnet/trigrams/*") >> } >> >> Group { >> fileTagsFilter: ["trigrams-map"] >> fileTags: ["qt.core.resource_data"] >> } >> Qt.core.resourceFileBaseName: "trigrams" >> Qt.core.resourcePrefix: "trigrams" >> >> Rule { >> id: idtrigrams >> inputs: ["trigrams"] >> explicitlyDependsOnFromDependencies: ["trigrams-generator"] >> >> Artifact { >> fileTags: ["trigrams-map"] >> filePath: FileInfo.joinPaths(project.buildDirectory, "trigrams", >> input.baseName + ".tmap") >> } >> prepare: { >> var runUtl = >> explicitlyDependsOn["trigrams-generator"][0].filePath >> var outputFile = FileInfo.joinPaths(project.buildDirectory, >> "trigrams", input.baseName + ".tmap"); >> >> var cmd = new Command(runUtl, [input.filePath, outputFile]); >> cmd.description = "sonnet parse trigrams"; >> cmd.highlight = "filegen"; >> return cmd; >> } >> } >> >> files: [ >> "qgit.cpp", >> ] >> } >> >> My variant: >> >> Product { >> name: "ParseTrigrams" >> targetName: "parsetrigrams" >> >> type: ["application", "trigrams-generator"] >> ... >> files: [ >> "parsetrigrams.cpp" >> ] >> Group { >> fileTagsFilter: "application" >> fileTags: "trigrams-generator" >> } >> } >> >> Product { >> name: "QGit" >> >> type: "application" >> >> Depends { name: "cpp" } >> Depends { productTypes: ["trigrams-generator"] } >> Depends { name: "Qt"; submodules: ["core", "widgets"] } >> >> Group { >> fileTags: "trigrams" >> files: FileInfo.joinPaths(product.sourceDirectory, >> "spellcheck/sonnet/trigrams/*") >> } >> >> Group { >> fileTagsFilter: ["trigrams-map"] >> fileTags: ["qt.core.resource_data"] >> } >> Qt.core.resourceFileBaseName: "trigrams" >> Qt.core.resourcePrefix: "trigrams" >> >> Rule { >> id: idtrigrams >> inputs: ["trigrams"] >> explicitlyDependsOnFromDependencies: ["trigrams-generator"] >> >> Artifact { >> fileTags: ["trigrams-map"] >> filePath: FileInfo.joinPaths(project.buildDirectory, "trigrams", >> input.baseName + ".tmap") >> } >> prepare: { >> var runUtl = >> explicitlyDependsOn["trigrams-generator"][0].filePath >> var outputFile = FileInfo.joinPaths(project.buildDirectory, >> "trigrams", input.baseName + ".tmap"); >> >> var cmd = new Command(runUtl, [input.filePath, outputFile]); >> cmd.description = "sonnet parse trigrams"; >> cmd.highlight = "filegen"; >> return cmd; >> } >> } >> >> files: [ >> "qgit.cpp", >> ] >> } >> >> The differences are as follows: >> For ParseTrigrams: >> type: ["application"] >> vs >> type: ["application", "trigrams-generator"] >> >> For QGit: >> Depends { name: "ParseTrigrams" } >> Depends { productTypes: ["trigrams-generator"] } >> vs >> Depends { productTypes: ["trigrams-generator"] } >> >> >> I would like to know if there is a fundamental difference in these >> solutions, and which variant is preferable? >> >> -- >> BR, Pavel >> >> >> >> 22.02.2021 13:00, Christian Kandeler пишет: >>> On 2/19/21 5:43 PM, Карелин Павел wrote: >>>> Project QGit__micro is attached. >>>> The situation is reproduced >>> >>> I've attached the corrected qbs files. >>> >>> >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qbs mailing list >>> Qbs@qt-project.org <mailto:Qbs@qt-project.org> >>> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs >>> <https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qbs mailing list >> Qbs@qt-project.org <mailto:Qbs@qt-project.org> >> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs >> <https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs> > > _______________________________________________ > Qbs mailing list > Qbs@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs
_______________________________________________ Qbs mailing list Qbs@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs