On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:03 PM John Snow <js...@redhat.com> wrote: > If we always install it in editable mode, and the path where it is > "installed" is what we expect it to be, it shouldn't have any problems > with being out of date.... I think. We could conceivably use the > "faux" package version the internal package has to signal when the > script needs to re-install it.
Stupid question, why not treat it just like avocado?
