On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 04:01:21PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> The next function numbers are expected to form a linked list ending with
> 0.
> 
> Fixes: 3a977deebe ("Intrdocue igb device emulation")
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
> ---
>  hw/net/igb_core.h | 3 +++
>  hw/net/igb.c      | 4 +---
>  hw/net/igbvf.c    | 5 ++++-
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/net/igb_core.h b/hw/net/igb_core.h
> index 9cbbfd516b..e1dab76995 100644
> --- a/hw/net/igb_core.h
> +++ b/hw/net/igb_core.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@
>  #define IGB_NUM_QUEUES          (16)
>  #define IGB_NUM_VM_POOLS        (8)
>  
> +#define IGB_VF_OFFSET           (0x80)
> +#define IGB_VF_STRIDE           (2)
> +
>  typedef struct IGBCore IGBCore;
>  
>  enum { PHY_R = BIT(0),
> diff --git a/hw/net/igb.c b/hw/net/igb.c
> index 1c989d7677..543ca0114a 100644
> --- a/hw/net/igb.c
> +++ b/hw/net/igb.c
> @@ -81,8 +81,6 @@ struct IGBState {
>  };
>  
>  #define IGB_CAP_SRIOV_OFFSET    (0x160)
> -#define IGB_VF_OFFSET           (0x80)
> -#define IGB_VF_STRIDE           (2)
>  
>  #define E1000E_MMIO_IDX     0
>  #define E1000E_FLASH_IDX    1
> @@ -431,7 +429,7 @@ static void igb_pci_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error 
> **errp)
>          hw_error("Failed to initialize AER capability");
>      }
>  
> -    pcie_ari_init(pci_dev, 0x150, 1);
> +    pcie_ari_init(pci_dev, 0x150, IGB_VF_OFFSET);
>  
>      pcie_sriov_pf_init(pci_dev, IGB_CAP_SRIOV_OFFSET, TYPE_IGBVF,
>          IGB_82576_VF_DEV_ID, IGB_MAX_VF_FUNCTIONS, IGB_MAX_VF_FUNCTIONS,


I think this change would break migrations from 8.0. No?


More importantly your commit log says linked list should end
with 0, but you make it point at a VF instead.


> diff --git a/hw/net/igbvf.c b/hw/net/igbvf.c
> index 284ea61184..bf2f237ab5 100644
> --- a/hw/net/igbvf.c
> +++ b/hw/net/igbvf.c
> @@ -240,6 +240,9 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps mmio_ops = {
>  static void igbvf_pci_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
>  {
>      IgbVfState *s = IGBVF(dev);
> +    uint16_t nextvfn = pcie_sriov_vf_number(dev) + 1;
> +    uint16_t nextfn = nextvfn < IGB_MAX_VF_FUNCTIONS ?
> +                      IGB_VF_OFFSET + nextvfn * IGB_VF_STRIDE : 0;
>      int ret;
>      int i;
>  
> @@ -270,7 +273,7 @@ static void igbvf_pci_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>          hw_error("Failed to initialize AER capability");
>      }
>  
> -    pcie_ari_init(dev, 0x150, 1);
> +    pcie_ari_init(dev, 0x150, nextfn);



For this one I don't see why it matters at all:

The presence of Shadow Functions does not affect this field.
For VFs, this field is undefined since VFs are located using First VF Offset 
(see § Section 9.3.3.9 ) and VF
Stride (see § Section 9.3.3.10 ).




>  }
>  
>  static void igbvf_pci_uninit(PCIDevice *dev)
> -- 
> 2.41.0


Reply via email to