On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 02:13:46PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> I couldn't find such a behavior specified.

Is it fixing a bug or just removing unnecessary code?
Is this guest visible at all?

> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
> ---
>  hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c
> index 9d668b8d6c17..410bc090fc58 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c
> @@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev)
>          pci_set_enabled(dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i], false);
>      }
>      dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs = 0;
> -    pci_set_word(dev->config + dev->exp.sriov_cap + PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF, 0);
>  }
>  
>  void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address,
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0


Reply via email to