On 10/10/19 3:05 AM, Li Qiang wrote:
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com <mailto:phi...@redhat.com>> 于
2019年10月10日周四 上午3:54写道:
Hi Li,
On 10/9/19 4:28 AM, Li Qiang wrote:
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com
<mailto:phi...@redhat.com> <mailto:phi...@redhat.com
<mailto:phi...@redhat.com>>> 于
> 2019年10月8日周二 下午10:47写道:
>
> Since v1:
> - Removed the pci-host devices
>
>
> Hello I want to know why remove this?
I haven't removed the devices, I simply remove the patches converting
them to DeviceReset,
Yes, I mean the patches.
basically because I've not enough time to check if
the are on a bus that would reset them.
IIUC, they are right.
I added these devices on my TODO
list for later, so meanwhile the other devices can be easily reviewed
and merged. When few patches from a series are not reviewed or
incorrect, sometime the rest of the series is not merged, so I
prefer to
split it and get these patches merged.
As far as I can see, most of the devices' usage of qemu_register_reset
function can be
convert to 'dc->reset'. In the main function.
qemu_register_reset(qbus_reset_all_fn, sysbus_get_default());
The 'qbus_reset_all_fn' calls 'qbus_reset_all' from the 'main-sys-bus'.
Then 'qdev_reset_one'
will call 'device_reset'. So IIUC every bus attached to 'main-sys-bus'
can be reset through 'dc->reset'
So I'm quite sure most of the cases that devices use
'qemu_register_reset' can be changed to 'dc->reset'.
Seems you're busy, If you don't mind, I can do some of the work to
convert 'reset' callback(not a patchset, one by one).
I guess we are all busy ;) I'm just trying to prioritize here.
This series is not very important because what we have today works, and
I would rather not introduce regressions. What happened then is it is
the 3rd time at least I get confuse with the qemu_register_reset()
function while reviewing code. Then my rule of thumb is if an
improvement takes less than 1h, then I just do it and keep going, else
if I postpone it I'll never go back to it. When a series start to take
too much rework it means I might started it wrongly, or I underestimated
the time required. Time that is taken of other more important tasks.
Today I prefer merged a subset of the series that is correct, rather
than aiming for the whole and never get it merged.
If you are interested in respining/fixing the pci-host devices I'd be
very thankful! I appreciate your help (and reviews).
Regards,
Phil.
PD: I'll respin as v3 with your tags and the PIIX4_IDE fix.
>
> - Removed the vmcoreinfo conversion (elmarco) but add a comment.
> - Added Igor's R-b tag.
>
> Following the thread discussion between Peter/Markus/Damien about
> reset handlers:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg617103.html
> I started to remove qemu_register_reset() calls from few
qdevified
> devices (the trivial ones).
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.
>
> v1:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-09/msg06367.html
>
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (8):
> hw/acpi/piix4: Convert reset handler to DeviceReset
> hw/isa/piix4: Convert reset handler to DeviceReset
> hw/ide/piix: Convert reset handler to DeviceReset
> hw/ide/sii3112: Convert reset handler to DeviceReset
> hw/ide/via82c: Convert reset handler to DeviceReset
> hw/isa/vt82c686: Convert reset handler to DeviceReset
> hw/input/lm832x: Convert reset handler to DeviceReset
> hw/misc/vmcoreinfo: Document its reset handler