On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 09:59 +0100, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 06.11.19 16:44, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 16:27 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/common.filter | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.filter 
> > > b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.filter
> > > index 9f418b4881..63bc6f6f26 100644
> > > --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.filter
> > > +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.filter
> > > @@ -227,5 +227,29 @@ _filter_qmp_empty_return()
> > >      grep -v '{"return": {}}'
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +_filter_json_filename()
> > > +{
> > > +    $PYTHON -c 'import sys
> > > +result, *fnames = sys.stdin.read().split("json:{")
> > 
> > Very minor nitpick, maybe I would give 'fnames' a more generic name,
> > since its is just result of a split, thus not really a list of filenames.
> > Feel free to ignore that though.
> 
> Hm...  It is a list of filenames, namely of all nested json:{}
> filenames.  I could call it fname_split, but I actually think fnames is
> not too wrong.

Makes sense, I guess leave it as is.

> 
> In any case, thanks for reviewing again!

No problem! Thanks to you too for making these tests more generic,
this is IMHO very very good thing, especially with all the qcow2
corruptions we see recently.


Best regards,
        Maxim Levitsky


> 
> Max
> 



Reply via email to