Am 03.09.2020 um 12:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben: > Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes: > > > Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes: > > > >> I let this series slide to get my Error API rework done, along with much > >> else. My sincere apologies! > >> > >> Unsurprisingly, it needs a rebase now. I suggest to let me review it as > >> is first. > > > > I'm done with v6. Summary: > > > > * A few trivial things to correct here and there. > > > > * A few ideas to improve things in relatively minor ways. > > > > * PATCH 03 looks "why bother" to me until PATCH 09 makes me suspect you > > did the former to enable the latter. If you had captured that in your > > commit message back then, like you did for the similar PATCH 05, I > > wouldn't be scratching my head now :) > > > > * I dislike PATCH 06, and would like to explore an alternative idea. > > > > * PATCH 08 makes hairy monitor code even hairier, but I don't have > > better ideas. > > > > * I don't feel comfortable as a sole reviewer of the AIO magic in PATCH > > 10-12. Let's ask Stefan for an eye-over. > > > > I'd like to proceed as follows. You rebase, and address "easy" review > > comments (you decide what's easy). Post as v7, cc'ing Stefan for the > > AIO magic and David Gilbert for HMP. While they review (hopefully), I > > explore a replacement for PATCH 06. And then we touch bases and decide > > how to get this thing wrapped. > > I explored: > > Subject: Ways to do per-coroutine properties (was: [PATCH v6 06/12] > monitor: Make current monitor a per-coroutine property) > Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:09:19 +0200 (3 weeks, 5 days, 21 hours ago) > Message-ID: <87a6z6wqkg.fsf...@dusky.pond.sub.org> > > May I have v7? Feel free to keep your PATCH 06. If I decide to replace > it, I can do it myself, possibly on top.
It's one of the next things on my list. I can't promise anything more specific, though. Kevin