On 6/8/21 11:01 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/06/2021 16.27, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes:
On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken...
Um, what?
Really what we want is to probe the -M (machines) that a binary
supports rather than just barfing the test because we've built a QEMU
that doesn't support all the random 32 bit machines.
r~
and besides it's not likely this is
improving out coverage by much. Test the "virt" machine for both arm
and aarch64 as it can be used by either architecture.
I think this point still stands though, I don't think we get much from
running the cdrom test with realview et all on qemu-system-aarch64.
In a lot of CI pipelines, we are either building aarch64 or arm, but not
both, so I think it might be good to keep the tests in here.
Thomas
I'm deferring to Thomas on this -- it has just a little bit less to do
with the CDROM itself and more to do with machine configuration, which I
consider outside of my wheelhouse here.
--js
