On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:03 PM, malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote:
> How's putting UINT_MAX into int64_t more appropriate? UINT_MAX is
> even one less than one in 32.32 fixpoint... I must be missing something
> here.

Right, the patch series used to have 2^32 -1, so it can fit in a
16bits or 32bits integer.

So what I meant is rather G_MAXUINT32.

-- 
Marc-André Lureau

Reply via email to