On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Marc-Andr? Lureau wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:03 PM, malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote: > > How's putting UINT_MAX into int64_t more appropriate? UINT_MAX is > > even one less than one in 32.32 fixpoint... I must be missing something > > here. > > Right, the patch series used to have 2^32 -1, so it can fit in a > 16bits or 32bits integer. > > So what I meant is rather G_MAXUINT32.
Just leave it as is, it's perfectly fine. -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
