Il 14/03/2012 10:17, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: > If we want to do this, it needs to be the same patch, as we couple the > transaction actions with top-level commands as long as there is no other > way to discover the possible actions. And it probably makes more sense > anyway, because the top-level command would be just a thin wrapper > around the transactional one. > > Only problem is that just moving the code there doesn't make it suitable > for a transaction and doing an all-or-nothing drive-reopen isn't quite > trivial.
We can also add a "transactionable" item to query-commands. If we do it after 1.1, in absence of it only blockdev-snapshot-sync and drive-mirror are transactionable. Otherwise we can do it now. Paolo
