Am 14.03.2012 10:19, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Il 14/03/2012 10:17, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: >> If we want to do this, it needs to be the same patch, as we couple the >> transaction actions with top-level commands as long as there is no other >> way to discover the possible actions. And it probably makes more sense >> anyway, because the top-level command would be just a thin wrapper >> around the transactional one. >> >> Only problem is that just moving the code there doesn't make it suitable >> for a transaction and doing an all-or-nothing drive-reopen isn't quite >> trivial. > > We can also add a "transactionable" item to query-commands. If we do it > after 1.1, in absence of it only blockdev-snapshot-sync and drive-mirror > are transactionable. Otherwise we can do it now.
Sounds reasonable. If we want to do it, I would prefer to do it right now. Kevin
