From: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
We cannot have duplicate memory regions, something would be deeply
flawed elsewhere. Let's just stop the search once we found an entry.
We'll add more sanity checks when adding memory regions later.
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raph...@enfabrica.net>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240214151701.29906-9-da...@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasq...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
---
subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
b/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
index 2e8b611385..7f29e01c30 100644
--- a/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
+++ b/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
@@ -896,8 +896,7 @@ vu_rem_mem_reg(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg) {
i--;
found = true;
-
- /* Continue the search for eventual duplicates. */
+ break;
}
}
--
MST
