On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:04:36AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > I don't have bandwidth for non-trivial cosmetic stuff at the > > moment, sorry. > > What's "bandwidth" in this context?
Time. My review queue is 120 patches at the moment. I'm tackling those which are blocked on me and which fix bugs/add features first. > Initially I thought that just making 2 or 3 functions which > were inconsistent with each other to be a very easy task. > But the patchset grew to 11 patches and 5 versions, because > pbonzini said it is insufficient. Now you're saying it is > too much. > > I spent *much* more than any sane amount of time on this, > rediffing and rewriting, on a *trivial* thing, and now what? > > If you can't plan even the most simple and low-level interface > to be consistent, please at least let someone who is STILL > willing to make it consistent to do that. It is not cosmetic. > And if the code will grow this way further (and it does!), > it will be a very big ball of mud, unmaintainable. I'm not blocking this series. If others are happy with this series then please merge. Stefan
