On Jun 26 2024, Warner Losh wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 9:48 AM Richard Henderson < > richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On 6/26/24 01:23, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> > On Jun 25 2024, Richard Henderson wrote: >> > >> >> can always force the use of a non-zero base with -B or -R. >> > >> > $ qemu-riscv64 -d page -B 0x3ee000 hello.riscv64 >> > host mmap_min_addr=0x1000 (fallback) >> > qemu-riscv64: /daten/src/test/hello.riscv64: requires virtual address >> space that is in use (omit the -B option or choose a different value) >> > >> >> Well, sure, but that obviously is where qemu-riscv64 itself is located. >> Still not a valid test case. >> > > Yea, what happens if you say -B 0x3ee000000 or something else that won't > conflict?
I didn't chose that number, qemu did. If it doesn't work then qemu must be fixed. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."
