use ranges_overlap() instead of open-coding the overlap check to improve the readability of the code.
Signed-off-by: Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.f...@fujitsu.com> --- hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c b/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c index 49205ab76d38..cdca359e1d88 100644 --- a/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c +++ b/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include "qemu/error-report.h" #include "qapi/error.h" #include "qemu/units.h" +#include "qemu/range.h" #include "trace.h" #include "hw/irq.h" @@ -246,8 +247,7 @@ static bool aspeed_smc_flash_overlap(const AspeedSMCState *s, asc->reg_to_segment(s, s->regs[R_SEG_ADDR0 + i], &seg); - if (new->addr + new->size > seg.addr && - new->addr < seg.addr + seg.size) { + if (ranges_overlap(new->addr, new->size, seg.addr, seg.size)) { aspeed_smc_error("new segment CS%d [ 0x%" HWADDR_PRIx" - 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx" ] overlaps with " "CS%d [ 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx" - 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx" ]", -- 2.41.0