Previously it was allowed to call object_unparent() for a memory region
in instance_finalize() of its parent. However, such a call typically
has no effect because child objects get unparented before
instance_finalize().

Worse, memory regions typically gets finalized when they get unparented
before instance_finalize(). This means calling object_unparent() for
them in instance_finalize() is to call the function for an object
already finalized, which should be avoided.

Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
---
 docs/devel/memory.rst | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/devel/memory.rst b/docs/devel/memory.rst
index 69c5e3f914ac..83760279e3db 100644
--- a/docs/devel/memory.rst
+++ b/docs/devel/memory.rst
@@ -168,11 +168,10 @@ and VFIOQuirk in hw/vfio/pci.c.
 
 You must not destroy a memory region as long as it may be in use by a
 device or CPU.  In order to do this, as a general rule do not create or
-destroy memory regions dynamically during a device's lifetime, and only
-call object_unparent() in the memory region owner's instance_finalize
-callback.  The dynamically allocated data structure that contains the
-memory region then should obviously be freed in the instance_finalize
-callback as well.
+destroy memory regions dynamically during a device's lifetime, and do not
+call object_unparent().  The dynamically allocated data structure that contains
+the memory region then should be freed in the instance_finalize callback, which
+is called after it gets unparented.
 
 If you break this rule, the following situation can happen:
 
@@ -199,8 +198,9 @@ but nevertheless it is used in a few places.
 
 For regions that "have no owner" (NULL is passed at creation time), the
 machine object is actually used as the owner.  Since instance_finalize is
-never called for the machine object, you must never call object_unparent
-on regions that have no owner, unless they are aliases or containers.
+never called for the machine object, you must never free regions that have no
+owner, unless they are aliases or containers, which you can manually call
+object_unparent() for.
 
 
 Overlapping regions and priority

---
base-commit: 31669121a01a14732f57c49400bc239cf9fd505f
change-id: 20240829-memory-cfd3ee0af44d

Best regards,
-- 
Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>


Reply via email to