On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 3:05 PM Eugenio Perez Martin <epere...@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 1:02 PM Eugenio Perez Martin
> <epere...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:17 AM <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > vhost_svq_get_buf() may return a VirtQueueElement that should be freed.
> > >
> > > It's unclear to me if the vhost_svq_get_buf() call should always
> return NULL.
> > >
> >
> > Continuing conversation of v2,
> >
> > Yes there are situations where vhost_svq_get_buf can return a valid
> > buffer here and we could leak memory, so this fixes a bug.
> >
> > So,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Eugenio Pérez <epere...@redhat.com>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> (I hit "send" too early)
>
> Wwe could use a better patch subject though. Even "Freeing leaked
> memory from vhost_svq_get_buf in vhost_svq_poll" would work better for
> me. What do you think?
>
> Thanks!
>

ok thanks!


>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> > > index 3b2beaea24..37aca8b431 100644
> > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> > > @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ static uint16_t vhost_svq_last_desc_of_chain(const
> VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> > >      return i;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +G_GNUC_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT
> > >  static VirtQueueElement *vhost_svq_get_buf(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> > >                                             uint32_t *len)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -528,6 +529,7 @@ size_t vhost_svq_poll(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> size_t num)
> > >      size_t len = 0;
> > >
> > >      while (num--) {
> > > +        g_autofree VirtQueueElement *elem = NULL;
> > >          int64_t start_us = g_get_monotonic_time();
> > >          uint32_t r = 0;
> > >
> > > @@ -541,7 +543,7 @@ size_t vhost_svq_poll(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> size_t num)
> > >              }
> > >          } while (true);
> > >
> > > -        vhost_svq_get_buf(svq, &r);
> > > +        elem = vhost_svq_get_buf(svq, &r);
> > >          len += r;
> > >      }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.45.2.827.g557ae147e6
> > >
>
>
>

-- 
Marc-André Lureau

Reply via email to