On 6/11/25 09:49, Jamin Lin via wrote:
Add initial support for the Aspeed AST1060 SoC. The AST1060 reuses most
of the AST1030 peripheral device models, as the two SoCs share nearly
the same controllers including WDT, SCU, TIMER, HACE, ADC, I2C, FMC,
and SPI.
A new common initialization and realization framework (ast10x0_init
and ast10x0_realize) is leveraged so AST1060 can instantiate the
existing AST1030 models without redefining duplicate device types.
Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin <[email protected]>
---
hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
index c85c21b149..17f5285d85 100644
--- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
+++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
@@ -190,6 +190,25 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast1030_init(Object *obj)
object_initialize_child(obj, "peci", &s->peci, TYPE_ASPEED_PECI);
}
+static void aspeed_soc_ast1060_init(Object *obj)
+{
+ char socname[8] = "ast1030";
+
+ /*
+ * The AST1060 SoC reuses the AST1030 device models. Since all peripheral
+ * models (e.g. WDT, SCU, TIMER, HACE, ADC, I2C, FMC, SPI) defined for
+ * AST1030 are compatible with AST1060, we simply reuse the existing
+ * AST1030 models for AST1060.
+ *
+ * To simplify the implementation, AST1060 sets its socname to that of
+ * AST1030, avoiding the need to create a full set of new
+ * TYPE_ASPEED_1060_XXX device definitions. This allows the same
+ * TYPE_ASPEED_1030_WDT and other models to be instantiated for both
+ * SoCs.
+ */
+ aspeed_soc_ast10x0_init(obj, socname);
Why not simply use:
aspeed_soc_ast10x0_init(obj, "ast1030");
?
+}
