Hi Philippe,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/12] hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0: Add AST1060 SoC
> support
> 
> On 6/11/25 09:49, Jamin Lin via wrote:
> > Add initial support for the Aspeed AST1060 SoC. The AST1060 reuses
> > most of the AST1030 peripheral device models, as the two SoCs share
> > nearly the same controllers including WDT, SCU, TIMER, HACE, ADC, I2C,
> > FMC, and SPI.
> >
> > A new common initialization and realization framework (ast10x0_init
> > and ast10x0_realize) is leveraged so AST1060 can instantiate the
> > existing AST1030 models without redefining duplicate device types.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c | 61
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c index
> > c85c21b149..17f5285d85 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> > @@ -190,6 +190,25 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast1030_init(Object *obj)
> >       object_initialize_child(obj, "peci", &s->peci, TYPE_ASPEED_PECI);
> >   }
> >
> > +static void aspeed_soc_ast1060_init(Object *obj) {
> > +    char socname[8] = "ast1030";
> > +
> > +    /*
> > +     * The AST1060 SoC reuses the AST1030 device models. Since all
> peripheral
> > +     * models (e.g. WDT, SCU, TIMER, HACE, ADC, I2C, FMC, SPI) defined
> for
> > +     * AST1030 are compatible with AST1060, we simply reuse the existing
> > +     * AST1030 models for AST1060.
> > +     *
> > +     * To simplify the implementation, AST1060 sets its socname to that of
> > +     * AST1030, avoiding the need to create a full set of new
> > +     * TYPE_ASPEED_1060_XXX device definitions. This allows the same
> > +     * TYPE_ASPEED_1030_WDT and other models to be instantiated for
> both
> > +     * SoCs.
> > +     */
> > +    aspeed_soc_ast10x0_init(obj, socname);
> 
> Why not simply use:
> 
>         aspeed_soc_ast10x0_init(obj, "ast1030");
> 
> ?

Thanks for the review and suggestions.
Will update it.

Thanks,
Jamin

> 
> > +}

Reply via email to