Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> writes: > Reinoud Zandijk <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 1/14/26 12:28, Reinoud Zandijk wrote: > > [...] > >>> We're not asking you to keep CI up-to-date (which Thomas is doing now, >>> despite having no specific need that I know of to support NetBSD), just to >>> *report* failure to build from source and tell us "hey, that's how we fixed >>> it". Otherwise we have the false impression that no one even cares about >>> new QEMU on NetBSD. >> >> As pkgsrc normally tracks releases and has a directory with local patches on >> top of that, build errors only show up when we bump the version. Version 10.2 >> is now in pkgsrc though I am running 10.1.3 so there is surely interest in >> keeping it running. I could try to commit some more trivial patches in the >> repo here to reduce the diffs some more. > > Fixing the build long after it broke is less than ideal. What would it > take to get NetBSD covered in CI?
We have the ability to run tests via the vm-build: make vm-build-netbsd however to take full advantage that needs a runner with a reasonable amount of memory and access to KVM so it can run reasonably fast. Does anyone want to host a dedicated x86_64 custom runner? -- Alex Bennée Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
