Yes, it does seem like v1 was picked up and not v2. v1 was broken for this
reason.

On Wednesday, February 11, 2026, Dmitry Osipenko <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2/4/26 22:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > From: Joelle van Dyne <[email protected]>
> >
> > When `owner` == `mr`, `object_unparent` will crash:
> >
> > object_unparent(mr) ->
> > object_property_del_child(mr, mr) ->
> > object_finalize_child_property(mr, name, mr) ->
> > object_unref(mr) ->
> > object_finalize(mr) ->
> > object_property_del_all(mr) ->
> > object_finalize_child_property(mr, name, mr) ->
> > object_unref(mr) ->
> > fail on g_assert(obj->ref > 0)
> >
> > However, passing a different `owner` to `memory_region_init` does not
> > work. `memory_region_ref` has an optimization where it takes a ref
> > only on the owner. That means when flatviews are created, it does not
> > take a ref on the region and you can get a UAF from `flatview_destroy`
> > called from RCU.
> >
> > The correct fix therefore is to use `NULL` as the name which will set
> > the `owner` but not the `parent` (which is still NULL). This allows us
> > to use `memory_region_ref` on itself while not having to rely on unparent
> > for cleanup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joelle van Dyne <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> > Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
> b/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
> > index 07f6355ad6..6a83fb63c8 100644
> > --- a/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
> > +++ b/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
> > @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ virtio_gpu_virgl_map_resource_blob(VirtIOGPU *g,
> >      vmr->g = g;
> >
> >      mr = &vmr->mr;
> > -    memory_region_init_ram_ptr(mr, OBJECT(mr), "blob", size, data);
> > +    memory_region_init_ram_ptr(mr, OBJECT(mr), NULL, size, data);
> >      memory_region_add_subregion(&b->hostmem, offset, mr);
> >      memory_region_set_enabled(mr, true);
> >
> > @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ virtio_gpu_virgl_unmap_resource_blob(VirtIOGPU *g,
> >          /* memory region owns self res->mr object and frees it by
> itself */
> >          memory_region_set_enabled(mr, false);
> >          memory_region_del_subregion(&b->hostmem, mr);
> > -        object_unparent(OBJECT(mr));
> > +        object_unref(OBJECT(mr));
> >      }
> >
> >      return 0;
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> This patch introduces regression. Running any venus application results
> in a crash:
>
> Thread 2 "qemu-system-x86" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x00007ffff56565e2 in __strcmp_evex () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #1  0x0000555555841bdb in find_fd (head=0x5555572337d0 <cpr_state>,
> name=0x0, id=0) at ../migration/cpr.c:68
> #2  cpr_delete_fd (name=name@entry=0x0, id=id@entry=0) at
> ../migration/cpr.c:77
> #3  0x000055555582290a in qemu_ram_free (block=0x7ff7e93aa7f0) at
> ../system/physmem.c:2615
> #4  0x000055555581ae02 in memory_region_finalize (obj=<optimized out>)
> at ../system/memory.c:1816
> #5  0x0000555555a70ab9 in object_deinit (obj=<optimized out>,
> type=<optimized out>) at ../qom/object.c:715
> #6  object_finalize (data=0x7ff7e936eff0) at ../qom/object.c:729
> #7  object_unref (objptr=0x7ff7e936eff0) at ../qom/object.c:1232
> #8  0x0000555555814fae in memory_region_unref (mr=<optimized out>) at
> ../system/memory.c:1848
> #9  flatview_destroy (view=0x555559ed6c40) at ../system/memory.c:301
> #10 0x0000555555bfc122 in call_rcu_thread (opaque=<optimized out>) at
> ../util/rcu.c:324
> #11 0x0000555555bf17a7 in qemu_thread_start (args=0x555557b99520) at
> ../util/qemu-thread-posix.c:393
> #12 0x00007ffff556f464 in start_thread () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #13 0x00007ffff55f25ac in __clone3 () at /lib64/libc.so.6
>
> There is a v2 version of this patch that doesn't crash [1]. Was v1
> applied by mistake instead of v2?
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Dmitry
>

Reply via email to