On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 12:43:11AM +0100, Mohamed Mediouni wrote: > On the 1st party Microsoft headers side (as in WHP), the two banks are > defined separately. > > For example: > > ACountMCountSupport instead of a_count_m_count_support > > Any reason in particular to diverge and would you prefer to use the > definition here in WHP too? > > Thank you, >
I am using the rust-vmm/mshv crates as a reference for the MSHV interface. I'm cherry picking the definition as we need them from this source usually: https://github.com/rust-vmm/mshv/blob/008ed04a85f98c376ea728f1db87f7de07d79a66/hv-headers/hvhdk.h#L1384 I think in the future we want to move those definitions into the kernel's mshv UAPI header, so the WHPX code is probably more correct in this regard and the MSHV will do something similar in the future. best, magnus
