On 11/02/2026 19:07, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 February 2026 10:45:09 CET Andrey Erokhin wrote:
>> (BTW, is it OK that there is no fmode/dmode processing in system/vl.c?)
> 
> You mean error handling of these options. Well, earlier error handling on one 
> hand might be more desirable, but OTOH it might also be more complicated to 
> be handled in vl.c than either in 9p.c or 9p-local.c I guess.
I mean dmode/fmode do not reach 9p-local.c, at least when used in `-virtfs 
local,...`

Reply via email to