On 11/02/2026 19:07, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > On Tuesday, 10 February 2026 10:45:09 CET Andrey Erokhin wrote: >> (BTW, is it OK that there is no fmode/dmode processing in system/vl.c?) > > You mean error handling of these options. Well, earlier error handling on one > hand might be more desirable, but OTOH it might also be more complicated to > be handled in vl.c than either in 9p.c or 9p-local.c I guess. I mean dmode/fmode do not reach 9p-local.c, at least when used in `-virtfs local,...`
- Re: [RFC PATCH] virtfs: 9p: local: add default uid a... Andrey Erokhin
- Re: [RFC PATCH] virtfs: 9p: local: add default ... Christian Schoenebeck
- Re: [RFC PATCH] virtfs: 9p: local: add defa... Andrey Erokhin
- Re: [RFC PATCH] virtfs: 9p: local: add ... Christian Schoenebeck
