> On 16. Feb 2026, at 04:44, Richard Henderson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We no longer support kvm for aarch32, therefore the aarch64 > test is trivially true. > Hello,
Probably harmless but aren’t AArch32 guests on an AArch64 KVM host still supported? aarch64_cpu_set_aarch64 in target/arm/cpu.c unsets ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64 for being able to support that case. Thank you, > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> > --- > target/arm/cpu64.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c > index 5d7c6b7fbb..10c6796548 100644 > --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c > +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c > @@ -767,9 +767,7 @@ static void aarch64_host_initfn(Object *obj) > ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj); > #if defined(CONFIG_KVM) > kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu); > - if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) { > - aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj); > - } > + aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj); > #elif defined(CONFIG_HVF) > hvf_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu); > #elif defined(CONFIG_WHPX) > -- > 2.43.0 > >
