Hi Zhenzhong,

I'm a bit confused about this patch.

All the other VTD_ECAP_* are masks for the ecap qword.
The purpose of this new definition of ECAP_PSS differs a bit as it extracts the 
field itself :/

cmd

________________________________
From: Zhenzhong Duan <[email protected]>
Sent: 14 February 2026 04:41
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
[email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] 
<[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] 
<[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
[email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] 
<[email protected]>; CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF 
<[email protected]>; [email protected] 
<[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
[email protected] <[email protected]>; Zhenzhong Duan 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [RFCv2 PATCH 12/13] intel_iommu_accel: Add pasid bits size check

Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this 
email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe.


If pasid bits size is bigger than host side, host could fail to emulate
all bindings in guest. Add a check to fail device plug early.

Pasid bits size should also be no more than 20 bits according to PCI spec.

Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <[email protected]>
---
 hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 1 +
 hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 5 +++++
 hw/i386/intel_iommu_accel.c    | 8 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
index e4bcc884b0..e5518a94ea 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@
 #define VTD_ECAP_MHMV               (15ULL << 20)
 #define VTD_ECAP_SRS                (1ULL << 31)
 #define VTD_ECAP_NWFS               (1ULL << 33)
+#define VTD_ECAP_PSS(x)             extract64(x, 35, 5)
 #define VTD_ECAP_PASID              (1ULL << 40)
 #define VTD_ECAP_PDS                (1ULL << 42)
 #define VTD_ECAP_SMTS               (1ULL << 43)
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index 6483cb3d85..c1b31b17de 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -5545,6 +5545,11 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s, Error 
**errp)
         error_setg(errp, "Need to set scalable mode for PASID");
         return false;
     }
+    if (s->pasid >= PCI_EXT_CAP_PASID_MAX_WIDTH) {
+        error_setg(errp, "PASID width %d, exceed Max PASID Width %d allowed "
+                   "in PCI spec", s->pasid, PCI_EXT_CAP_PASID_MAX_WIDTH);
+        return false;
+    }

     if (s->svm) {
         if (!x86_iommu->dt_supported) {
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_accel.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_accel.c
index acb1b1e238..15412123d5 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_accel.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_accel.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ bool vtd_check_hiod_accel(IntelIOMMUState *s, 
VTDHostIOMMUDevice *vtd_hiod,
     HostIOMMUDevice *hiod = vtd_hiod->hiod;
     struct HostIOMMUDeviceCaps *caps = &hiod->caps;
     struct iommu_hw_info_vtd *vtd = &caps->vendor_caps.vtd;
+    uint8_t hpasid = VTD_ECAP_PSS(vtd->ecap_reg) + 1;
     PCIBus *bus = vtd_hiod->bus;
     PCIDevice *pdev = bus->devices[vtd_hiod->devfn];

@@ -64,6 +65,13 @@ bool vtd_check_hiod_accel(IntelIOMMUState *s, 
VTDHostIOMMUDevice *vtd_hiod,
         return false;
     }

+    /* Only do the check when host device support PASIDs */
+    if (caps->max_pasid_log2 && s->pasid > hpasid) {
+        error_setg(errp, "PASID bits size %d > host IOMMU PASID bits size %d",
+                   s->pasid, hpasid);
+        return false;
+    }
+
     if (pci_device_get_iommu_bus_devfn(pdev, &bus, NULL, NULL)) {
         error_setg(errp, "Host device downstream to a PCI bridge is "
                    "unsupported when x-flts=on");
--
2.47.3

Reply via email to