> Am 27.02.2026 um 13:14 schrieb Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>: > > Peter Maydell <[email protected]> writes: > > [...] > >> I guess for the moment we should fix the Coverity build >> by dropping the --enable-libnfs (and accepting that we >> don't scan block/nfs.c any more). For the longer term: >> >> * does anybody want to update block/nfs.c ? > > Plan A: somebody does that. I can look into it next week. Does that still fit in the cycle? Peter
- [PULL v2 19/19] python: add setuptools and wheel depe... John Snow
- [PULL v2 04/19] python/mkvenv: add mechanism to insta... John Snow
- Re: [PULL v2 00/19] Python patches Peter Maydell
- block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora 43 (was: Re: [PULL v... Peter Maydell
- Re: block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora 43 (was: Re... Daniel P . Berrangé
- Re: block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora 43 (was... Peter Maydell
- Re: block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora 43 (was... Peter Lieven
- Re: block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora 43 Thomas Huth
- Re: block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora... Peter Lieven
- Re: block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora 43 Markus Armbruster
- Re: block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora 43 Peter Lieven
- Re: block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora 43 Peter Maydell
- Re: block/nfs.c and libnfs vs Fedora 43 Thomas Huth
