On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 at 11:03, Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> wrote: > Neither function is ideal. But in their current state, I *strongly* > prefer qdev_get_human_name(), because I hate having to decipher a QOM > path less than having to guess what kind of device this might be, then > figure out what format its .get_dev_path() uses. > > If someone posts a patch to fix the shortcomings of > qdev_get_printable_name() I outlined above, we can talk.
How do you feel about the proposed unification of the two functions done in this patch? https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/ thanks -- PMM
