Peter Maydell <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 at 11:03, Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> wrote: >> Neither function is ideal. But in their current state, I *strongly* >> prefer qdev_get_human_name(), because I hate having to decipher a QOM >> path less than having to guess what kind of device this might be, then >> figure out what format its .get_dev_path() uses. >> >> If someone posts a patch to fix the shortcomings of >> qdev_get_printable_name() I outlined above, we can talk. > > How do you feel about the proposed unification of the two > functions done in this patch? > > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/
Thanks for the pointer, I'll reply there.
