On 07/01/2012 07:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 29/06/2012 14:26, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
Oh, I see. Should we place this device to hw/Makefile.objs in v2?
That would've been nice, but I'll do it as a follow-up now.
Yes, so we can also use Anthony's new CONFIG_ARCH_ARM (introducing
CONFIG_EXYNOS can be done later).
Paolo
So, what's the consensus here, for now new devices go to
hw/arm/Makefile.objs while somebody moves all new and old not
cpu-specific devices (not just exynos-related) from hw/arm/Makefile.objs
to hw/Makefile.objs with one commit? Because having one RTC device
compile through hw/Makefile.objs while all other exynos devices are
compiled through hw/arm/Makefile.objs doesn't makes much sense.
And also its not clear whether you're planning to compile these devices
through obj-y or through hw-obj-y, because we still have
target_phys_addr_t in our memory API.
