Il 02/07/2012 11:44, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > On 2 July 2012 10:42, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Personally, I believe it'd be best if board descriptions were moved to >> > hw/ARCH, even if all the required hardware is in hw/ and even if the >> > file can be moved from obj-y to hw-obj-y. However, this can be left >> > open to later discussion, and is complicated by the fact that some >> > boards (e.g. musicpal) include devices and machine models in the same file. > I don't personally see the distinction between "device model" and > "machine model" as particularly interesting, and I hope/think that > with increased QOMification the implementation differences beween > the two will tend go away.
I agree. The distinction is just that machine models often have a dependency on target-ARCH/ files, and that would be (for me) the line between hw/ and hw/ARCH. Paolo
