On 5/14/2026 7:11 AM, Shameer Kolothum Thodi wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Chen<[email protected]>
Sent: 12 May 2026 20:35
To:[email protected];[email protected]
Cc: Eric Auger<[email protected]>; Peter Maydell
<[email protected]>; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé<[email protected]>;
Zhao Liu<[email protected]>; Matt Ochs<[email protected]>; Nicolin
Chen<[email protected]>; Shameer Kolothum Thodi
<[email protected]>; Nathan Chen<[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Implement "auto" value for
"ats"

From: Nathan Chen<[email protected]>

Allow accelerated SMMUv3 Address Translation Services support property
to be derived from host IOMMU capabilities. Derive host values using
IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO, retrieving ATS capability from IDR0.

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chen<[email protected]>
---
  hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c |  9 +++++++++
  hw/arm/smmuv3.c       | 11 ++++-------
  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c
index 82c0800f4d..9fbd13c438 100644
--- a/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c
+++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c
@@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ static void
smmuv3_accel_auto_finalise(SMMUv3State *s,
          return;
      }

+    if (s->ats == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) {
+        s->idr[0] = FIELD_DP32(s->idr[0], IDR0, ATS,
+                               FIELD_EX32(info->idr[0], IDR0, ATS));
+    }
+
      accel->auto_finalised = true;
  }

@@ -964,6 +969,10 @@ bool smmuv3_accel_init(SMMUv3State *s, Error
**errp)
      bs->iommu_ops = &smmuv3_accel_ops;
      smmuv3_accel_as_init(s);

+    if (s->ats == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) {
+        s->s_accel->auto_mode = true;
+    }
+
      if (s->s_accel->auto_mode) {
          s->machine_done.notify = smmuv3_machine_done;
          qemu_add_machine_init_done_notifier(&s->machine_done);
diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
index 5c2855c377..e558f09652 100644
--- a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
+++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
@@ -1965,10 +1965,6 @@ static void smmu_reset_exit(Object *obj,
ResetType type)

  static bool smmu_validate_property(SMMUv3State *s, Error **errp)
  {
-    if (s->ats == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) {
-        error_setg(errp, "ats auto mode is not supported");
-        return false;
-    }
      if (s->ril == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) {
          error_setg(errp, "ril auto mode is not supported");
          return false;
@@ -2170,9 +2166,10 @@ static void smmuv3_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
const void *data)
          "Disable range invalidation support (for accel=on). ril=auto "
          "is not supported.");
      object_class_property_set_description(klass, "ats",
-        "Enable/disable ATS support (for accel=on). Please ensure host "
-        "platform has ATS support before enabling this. ats=auto is not "
-        "supported.");
+        "Enable/disable ATS support (for accel=on). "
+        "Valid values are on, off, and auto. Defaults to off. "
+        "Please ensure host platform supports ATS before setting it "
+        "to on.");
      object_class_property_set_description(klass, "oas",
          "Specify Output Address Size (for accel=on). Supported values "
          "are 44 or 48 bits. Defaults to 44 bits. oas=auto is not "
In smmuv3.c we have;

case SMMU_CMD_ATC_INV:
         {
             SMMUDevice *sdev = smmu_find_sdev(bs, CMD_SID(&cmd));

             if (!sdev || !s->ats) {
                 trace_smmuv3_unhandled_cmd(type);
                 break;
             }

             if (!smmuv3_accel_issue_inv_cmd(s, &cmd, sdev, errp)) {
                 cmd_error = SMMU_CERROR_ILL;
                 break;
             }
             break;
         }

The above !s->ats will be true for AUTO case, right? I think
we should change the above check with smmuv3_ats_enabled().

Also, since we modified the ats to OnOffAuto in the previous
series, I am not sure the above should be a fix patch or not.
I see, I will use smmuv3_ats_enabled() here to account for the AUTO case. I am not sure if it should have the Fixes tag either but let's see if we can get any guidance on that point.

Thanks,
Nathan

Reply via email to