Il 03/07/2012 22:15, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>> >
>> > I'd also vote for %u. PRI*32 do not seem very useful compared to plain
>> > int versions.
> If it's not useful we should use unsigned int.
It just means that we're assuming 32-bit ints, which is a fact. The day
an IL32 platform appears that has "typedef long int32_t", we'll worry
about PRIu32.
Paolo
> Mixing both is simply wrong. I'm okay with fixing it consistently in a
> follow-up though. The Broken Window theory scores again (lack of const,
> non-CamelCase type names, placement of {, wrong semicolons, etc.).
