On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/04/2012 10:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 03/07/2012 22:15, Andreas Färber ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>> I'd also vote for %u. PRI*32 do not seem very useful compared to plain >>>>> int versions. >>> If it's not useful we should use unsigned int. >> >> It just means that we're assuming 32-bit ints, which is a fact. The day >> an IL32 platform appears that has "typedef long int32_t", we'll worry >> about PRIu32. > > Newlib's <stdint.h> does just that, on platforms that __have_long32. > Which makes Cygwin a great platform for flushing out these sorts of type > discrepancies (since cygwin inherits from newlib). > > http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/newlib/libc/include/stdint.h.diff?r1=1.8&r2=1.9&cvsroot=src&f=h
Interesting, my thoughts went pretty much along Paolo's line. Now I think PRI*32 indeed makes some sense. But we don't support Cygwin builds (only mingw), would that be useful? > > -- > Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org > > >
