On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 9:48 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > -How contributors could comply with DCO terms (b) or (c) for the output of > > AI > > -content generators commonly available today is unclear. The QEMU project > > is > > -not willing or able to accept the legal risks of non-compliance. > > +If you wish to send large amounts of AI-generated changes, or any other > > +contribution not in the above categories, please get in touch with the > > +maintainer beforehand. > > To be clear, the implication is that > These can be accepted at the discretion of the maintainer
Yes. > Maybe make it explicit. Ok. > > + AI-used-for: tests, docs > > + AI-used-for: code > > + AI-used-for: code (refactoring) > > + AI-used-for: code (prototype) > > + AI-used-for: research > > Why include research here when we also explicitly say: > > > +These boundaries do not apply to other uses of AI, such as > researching > > +APIs or algorithms, static analysis, or debugging, provided the > model's > > +output is not included in contributions. I suppose it can still be useful for traceability. I copied it from Kevin's proposal but I can remove it. "Research" may also include using a script written by the LLM, which is encouraged in the first section. Paolo
