On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 10:04:40AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 9:59 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > + AI-used-for: tests, docs > > > > > + AI-used-for: code > > > > > + AI-used-for: code (refactoring) > > > > > + AI-used-for: code (prototype) > > > > > + AI-used-for: research > > > > BTW: commit log ? > > I don't think I want to encourage it to the point that it requires > highlighting, quite the opposite in fact. Using AI for minor edits is > irrelevant, while writing the bulk of the commit message should be a > conscious act of the submitter. > > This was also mentioned in the other thread. > > > > I suppose it can still be useful for traceability. I copied it from > > > Kevin's proposal but I can remove it. > > > > > > "Research" may also include using a script written by the LLM, which > > > is encouraged in the first section. > > > > but again, if the script is not merged, then the boundaries do not > > apply? > > See the first sentence above re. traceability and copying from Kevin's > proposal. :) > > Paolo
OK. It's all nitpicking on my side, anyway. -- MST
