On 6/16/26 06:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 at 00:52, Richard Henderson
<[email protected]> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
---
linux-user/aarch64/elfload.c | 1 +
target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c | 2 +-
docs/system/arm/emulation.rst | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This is fine as a patch, so
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]>
but maybe we should hold off on enabling SVE2p2 for "max"
until we have SME2p2 ? Architecturally if you have SVE2p2
and SME then you're supposed to also have SME2p2.
I know we usually don't worry about that kind of "feature X
implies feature Y" when adding a new feature, trusting the
guest to check separately for X and Y being present, but
I feel like SVE/SME versions are particularly likely to be
something guest software might make assumptions about here.
Fair enough. I wondered about that myself.
r~
